OCR any ICO
Drag and drop or click to select.
Private and secure
Everything happens in your browser. Your files never touch our servers.
Blazing fast
No uploading, no waiting. Convert the moment you drop a file.
Actually free
No account required. No hidden costs. No file size tricks.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
A quick tour of the pipeline
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
Engines and libraries
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Datasets and benchmarks
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
Output formats and downstream use
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
Practical guidance
- Start with data & cleanliness. If your images are phone photos or mixed-quality scans, invest in thresholding (adaptive & Otsu) and deskew (Hough) before any model tuning. You’ll often gain more from a robust preprocessing recipe than from swapping recognizers.
- Choose the right detector. For scanned pages with regular columns, a page segmenter (zones → lines) may suffice; for natural images, single-shot detectors like EAST are strong baselines and plug into many toolkits (OpenCV example).
- Pick a recognizer that matches your text. For printed Latin, Tesseract (LSTM/OEM) is sturdy and fast; for multi-script or quick prototypes, EasyOCR is productive; for handwriting or historical typefaces, consider Kraken or Calamari and plan to fine-tune. If you need tight coupling to document understanding (key-value extraction, VQA), evaluate TrOCR (OCR) versus Donut (OCR-free) on your schema—Donut may remove a whole integration step.
- Measure what matters. For end-to-end systems, report detection F-score and recognition CER/WER (both based on Levenshtein edit distance; see CTC); for layout-heavy tasks, track IoU/tightness and character-level normalized edit distance as in ICDAR RRC evaluation kits.
- Export rich outputs. Prefer hOCR /ALTO (or both) so you keep coordinates and reading order—vital for search hit highlighting, table/field extraction, and provenance. Tesseract’s CLI and pytesseract make this a one-liner.
Looking ahead
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Further reading & tools
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is OCR?
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
How does OCR work?
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
What are some practical applications of OCR?
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
Is OCR always 100% accurate?
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Can OCR recognize handwriting?
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Can OCR handle multiple languages?
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
What's the difference between OCR and ICR?
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
Does OCR work with any font and text size?
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
What are the limitations of OCR technology?
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Can OCR scan colored text or colored backgrounds?
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
What is the ICO format?
Microsoft icon
The ICO image format, standing as a cornerstone in the realm of digital iconography, plays a pivotal role in the user interface design of various software applications, especially within the Windows operating systems. At its core, the ICO format serves the primary function of storing one or more small images at multiple sizes and color depths. This allows icons to be scaled appropriately for different display scenarios without loss of quality, a functionality that is fundamental in providing a seamless user experience across diverse platforms and resolutions.
Historically, the ICO format was introduced with the first version of Windows (Windows 1.0) in the mid-1980s, marking its presence as a critical component in the graphical user interface (GUI). This evolutionary leap not only facilitated a more intuitive interaction with computers but also established a standardized method for representing applications, files, and functions within the operating system. The ability to include multiple resolutions and color depths within a single ICO file proved to be innovative, ensuring icons remained crisp and clear regardless of the display properties.
Technically, an ICO file is a container. It encapsulates differently sized images and, optionally, different color depths, thereby enabling icons to adapt dynamically to the display settings of the viewing environment. Each image within the ICO file is essentially a bitmap image, having its own pixel dimensions and color palette. This bitmap format allows for detailed icon designs with nuanced shading and transparency, providing the flexibility needed for intricate visual representations.
The structure of an ICO file is composed of a header, a directory, and one or more image data sections. The header defines the overall file type and acts as an indicator that the file is indeed an icon resource. Following the header is the directory, which functions as an index, listing each of the images contained within the file. For each listed image, the directory specifies properties such as the pixel dimensions, color depth, and the offset within the file where the actual image data is located.
Within the ICO format, color depth plays a significant role in determining the visual fidelity of an icon. Color depth, or bit depth, refers to the number of bits used to represent the color of a single pixel. Common depths include 1-bit (monochrome), 4-bit (16 colors), 8-bit (256 colors), 24-bit (true color), and 32-bit (true color + alpha channel). The inclusion of an alpha channel in 32-bit color depth allows for the representation of transparency effects, adding a layer of visual depth and sophistication to the icon designs.
One of the most notable features of the ICO format is its support for multiple image sizes and color depths within a single file. This flexibility is paramount in adapting to various display settings, such as different screen resolutions and color capabilities. A single ICO file can store icons in a wide range of dimensions, commonly including sizes like 16x16, 32x32, 48x48, and 64x64 pixels, as well as larger sizes for modern high-resolution displays. This ability to encapsulate several resolutions ensures that applications or websites can automatically display the most appropriate icon version, optimizing both appearance and performance.
The creation and manipulation of ICO files require specific software tools designed to handle the format's unique structure. Graphic design software, such as Adobe Photoshop with appropriate plugins, and specialized icon editing applications, allow designers to craft and customize icons before saving them in the ICO format. These tools typically provide the functionality to directly create new ICO files or convert existing images into ICO format, ensuring artists and developers can fine-tune icons to meet the exact needs of their projects.
Despite its widespread use and historical significance, the ICO format is not without its limitations and controversies. One of the primary critiques centers around its proprietary nature, as the format was developed and is largely utilized within the Windows operating systems. This has led to criticisms regarding interoperability and standardization, especially when compared to more universally accepted image formats like PNG. Furthermore, the ICO format's capabilities have occasionally struggled to keep pace with rapidly evolving display technologies and user interface design trends.
In response to these challenges, the development community has explored alternative formats and technologies for representing icons. Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) and Web Open Font Format (WOFF) have emerged as popular alternatives, offering advantages in terms of scalability, performance, and compatibility across different platforms and devices. Nonetheless, the ICO format retains its relevance and utility, particularly in applications and contexts where backward compatibility with older versions of Windows is a concern.
The process of creating an icon in ICO format typically involves several stages, starting with the conceptual design. Designers must consider various factors, including the icon's intended use, the target audience, and the platforms on which it will be displayed. The design phase is followed by the creation of digital drafts, utilizing graphic design software to produce images in different sizes and color depths. This multi-resolution approach ensures that the final icon will be visually coherent across all intended display scenarios.
The future of the ICO format in the evolving landscape of digital design and technology remains a topic of discussion among professionals in the field. While newer and more flexible formats gain traction for their cross-platform capabilities and advanced features, the ICO format's deep integration within the Windows ecosystem provides it a solid foundation of continued use. Its simplicity, combined with its capacity to bundle multiple resolutions and color depths into a single file, still holds value for certain applications and user demographics.
Moreover, the ICO format has undergone updates and improvements over the years, with modern versions supporting higher resolutions and additional color depths to better align with current display technology standards. These updates signal an ongoing commitment to refining the format, suggesting that it may continue to evolve in response to technological advancements and changing user expectations.
Ultimately, the ICO image format, with its rich history and robust functionality, occupies a unique place in the digital world. It exemplifies how technological standards can persist and remain relevant over time, adapting to new challenges and opportunities. For designers, developers, and end-users alike, the ICO format represents a bridge between the past and the future, encapsulating the ongoing journey of digital innovation.
Supported formats
AAI.aai
AAI Dune image
AI.ai
Adobe Illustrator CS2
AVIF.avif
AV1 Image File Format
BAYER.bayer
Raw Bayer Image
BMP.bmp
Microsoft Windows bitmap image
CIN.cin
Cineon Image File
CLIP.clip
Image Clip Mask
CMYK.cmyk
Raw cyan, magenta, yellow, and black samples
CUR.cur
Microsoft icon
DCX.dcx
ZSoft IBM PC multi-page Paintbrush
DDS.dds
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
DPX.dpx
SMTPE 268M-2003 (DPX 2.0) image
DXT1.dxt1
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
EPDF.epdf
Encapsulated Portable Document Format
EPI.epi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPS.eps
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSF.epsf
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSI.epsi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPT.ept
Encapsulated PostScript with TIFF preview
EPT2.ept2
Encapsulated PostScript Level II with TIFF preview
EXR.exr
High dynamic-range (HDR) image
FF.ff
Farbfeld
FITS.fits
Flexible Image Transport System
GIF.gif
CompuServe graphics interchange format
HDR.hdr
High Dynamic Range image
HEIC.heic
High Efficiency Image Container
HRZ.hrz
Slow Scan TeleVision
ICO.ico
Microsoft icon
ICON.icon
Microsoft icon
J2C.j2c
JPEG-2000 codestream
J2K.j2k
JPEG-2000 codestream
JNG.jng
JPEG Network Graphics
JP2.jp2
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPE.jpe
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPEG.jpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPG.jpg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPM.jpm
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPS.jps
Joint Photographic Experts Group JPS format
JPT.jpt
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JXL.jxl
JPEG XL image
MAP.map
Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database (MrSID)
MAT.mat
MATLAB level 5 image format
PAL.pal
Palm pixmap
PALM.palm
Palm pixmap
PAM.pam
Common 2-dimensional bitmap format
PBM.pbm
Portable bitmap format (black and white)
PCD.pcd
Photo CD
PCT.pct
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PCX.pcx
ZSoft IBM PC Paintbrush
PDB.pdb
Palm Database ImageViewer Format
PDF.pdf
Portable Document Format
PDFA.pdfa
Portable Document Archive Format
PFM.pfm
Portable float format
PGM.pgm
Portable graymap format (gray scale)
PGX.pgx
JPEG 2000 uncompressed format
PICT.pict
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PJPEG.pjpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
PNG.png
Portable Network Graphics
PNG00.png00
PNG inheriting bit-depth, color-type from original image
PNG24.png24
Opaque or binary transparent 24-bit RGB (zlib 1.2.11)
PNG32.png32
Opaque or binary transparent 32-bit RGBA
PNG48.png48
Opaque or binary transparent 48-bit RGB
PNG64.png64
Opaque or binary transparent 64-bit RGBA
PNG8.png8
Opaque or binary transparent 8-bit indexed
PNM.pnm
Portable anymap
PPM.ppm
Portable pixmap format (color)
PS.ps
Adobe PostScript file
PSB.psb
Adobe Large Document Format
PSD.psd
Adobe Photoshop bitmap
RGB.rgb
Raw red, green, and blue samples
RGBA.rgba
Raw red, green, blue, and alpha samples
RGBO.rgbo
Raw red, green, blue, and opacity samples
SIX.six
DEC SIXEL Graphics Format
SUN.sun
Sun Rasterfile
SVG.svg
Scalable Vector Graphics
TIFF.tiff
Tagged Image File Format
VDA.vda
Truevision Targa image
VIPS.vips
VIPS image
WBMP.wbmp
Wireless Bitmap (level 0) image
WEBP.webp
WebP Image Format
YUV.yuv
CCIR 601 4:1:1 or 4:2:2
Frequently asked questions
How does this work?
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
How long does it take to convert a file?
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
What happens to my files?
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
What file types can I convert?
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
How much does this cost?
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Can I convert multiple files at once?
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.