OCR any PJPEG
Drag and drop or click to select.
Private and secure
Everything happens in your browser. Your files never touch our servers.
Blazing fast
No uploading, no waiting. Convert the moment you drop a file.
Actually free
No account required. No hidden costs. No file size tricks.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
A quick tour of the pipeline
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
Engines and libraries
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Datasets and benchmarks
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
Output formats and downstream use
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
Practical guidance
- Start with data & cleanliness. If your images are phone photos or mixed-quality scans, invest in thresholding (adaptive & Otsu) and deskew (Hough) before any model tuning. You’ll often gain more from a robust preprocessing recipe than from swapping recognizers.
- Choose the right detector. For scanned pages with regular columns, a page segmenter (zones → lines) may suffice; for natural images, single-shot detectors like EAST are strong baselines and plug into many toolkits (OpenCV example).
- Pick a recognizer that matches your text. For printed Latin, Tesseract (LSTM/OEM) is sturdy and fast; for multi-script or quick prototypes, EasyOCR is productive; for handwriting or historical typefaces, consider Kraken or Calamari and plan to fine-tune. If you need tight coupling to document understanding (key-value extraction, VQA), evaluate TrOCR (OCR) versus Donut (OCR-free) on your schema—Donut may remove a whole integration step.
- Measure what matters. For end-to-end systems, report detection F-score and recognition CER/WER (both based on Levenshtein edit distance; see CTC); for layout-heavy tasks, track IoU/tightness and character-level normalized edit distance as in ICDAR RRC evaluation kits.
- Export rich outputs. Prefer hOCR /ALTO (or both) so you keep coordinates and reading order—vital for search hit highlighting, table/field extraction, and provenance. Tesseract’s CLI and pytesseract make this a one-liner.
Looking ahead
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Further reading & tools
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is OCR?
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
How does OCR work?
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
What are some practical applications of OCR?
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
Is OCR always 100% accurate?
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Can OCR recognize handwriting?
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Can OCR handle multiple languages?
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
What's the difference between OCR and ICR?
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
Does OCR work with any font and text size?
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
What are the limitations of OCR technology?
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Can OCR scan colored text or colored backgrounds?
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
What is the PJPEG format?
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
The Progressive JPEG (PJPEG) format is an extension of the conventional JPEG image format, known for its efficiency in compressing digital images and photographs. Unlike the standard JPEG that loads an image from top to bottom in a single pass, PJPEG loads the image in multiple passes, gradually increasing in quality. This technique offers a significant advantage in web design and online image presentation, where image loading speed and viewer engagement are critical. Understanding the technical intricacies of PJPEG can be beneficial for optimizing web performance and enhancing user experience.
PJPEG employs the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) technique, similar to standard JPEG. DCT works by breaking down the image into parts of varying frequencies and then quantizing these frequencies to reduce the file size. What distinguishes PJPEG from standard JPEG in this process is how it organizes and uses these DCT coefficients. PJPEG stores these coefficients in a way that allows for a progressive buildup of image quality. Initially, it displays a rough preview of the entire image using only the most significant coefficients, with subsequent passes adding finer details.
A crucial aspect of the PJPEG format is its compression process, which is divided into two primary stages: lossy and lossless. The lossy stage involves quantizing the DCT coefficients, which reduces the precision of the image details but significantly decreases the file size. During this stage, the coefficients are reordered to prioritize the most visually important information. The lossless stage entails a Huffman coding process, further compressing the image without any additional loss in quality. This dual-stage compression allows PJPEG images to load progressively without sacrificing the final image quality.
The process of encoding an image into PJPEG format involves creating multiple scans of the image, each with increasing detail. The first scan introduces a basic outline, displaying major colors and shapes. Successive scans add layers of detail, allowing the viewer to quickly grasp the essence of the image even before it has fully loaded. This aspect of PJPEG is particularly beneficial for images viewed over slow internet connections, where it's essential to deliver content efficiently without compromising on image quality.
Viewing an image encoded in PJPEG format requires a compatible web browser or image viewer that supports progressive rendering. As the image data is downloaded, the software interprets the scans in sequence, updating the display with higher fidelity representations of the image as more data becomes available. This creates a user experience where images seem to load faster because earlier, lower-quality versions of the image appear first, followed by gradual improvements in detail and clarity.
Another advantage of PJPEG over standard JPEG is the file size. While it may seem that storing multiple scans of the same image would result in larger files, the efficient compression techniques used in PJPEG often yield smaller file sizes for the same visual quality. This is because the initial scans require relatively few DCT coefficients to represent the image, and additional details are added in a highly optimized manner. This efficiency makes PJPEG an attractive option for optimizing website loading times and improving overall web performance.
In terms of disadvantages, one challenge with PJPEG is the need for specific software or browser support to fully benefit from its progressive loading feature. While most modern web browsers support PJPEG, some image editing software may not handle the format correctly, leading to difficulties in editing PJPEG files. Additionally, the progressive loading feature can be less noticeable on very fast connections, where the image might load almost instantly, negating the progressive enhancement.
From a developer's perspective, implementing PJPEG on websites requires careful consideration of image quality settings during the encoding process. The balance between file size and image quality is critical, as overly compressed images may load quickly but disappoint users with their poor quality. Conversely, too little compression can result in longer loading times, potentially harming user engagement. Developers must also be aware of the support and rendering capabilities of the browsers and devices their audiences are using to ensure a consistent experience.
The technical aspects of creating PJPEG files involve specialized software tools capable of handling JPEG encoding with progressive option settings. Adobe Photoshop, for instance, offers options to save images in the PJPEG format, allowing users to adjust the number of scans and the compression levels. For web development, there are various online tools and libraries that simplify the process of converting standard JPEG images into PJPEG, enabling developers to optimize their web assets more efficiently.
From a historical perspective, the JPEG format, including its progressive variant, was developed by the Joint Photographic Experts Group in the early 1990s as a part of digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) standards. With the explosion of the internet and digital photography, JPEG became one of the most widely used image formats due to its efficient compression that made sharing and displaying images online feasible. The introduction of PJPEG served to enhance the user experience by addressing the limitations of bandwidth and connection speeds prevalent at the time.
The use of PJPEG is not limited to web images. It also finds applications in other areas where efficient image loading and progressive display can enhance the user experience. For example, in online gaming, PJPEG can be used for loading game textures to provide players with a seamless experience even under bandwidth constraints. Similarly, in e-commerce, progressive images can help keep users engaged while browsing product galleries, improving the likelihood of conversion.
Moreover, the proliferation of high-resolution displays and mobile devices has influenced the application of PJPEG. On high-resolution screens, loading high-quality images can be bandwidth-intensive. PJPEG enables a compromise by allowing images to be displayed at a lower quality initially, then progressively enhanced, reducing the perceived loading time. This approach is particularly advantageous in mobile environments, where data usage and speed can be limiting factors.
Environmental considerations also play a role in the adoption of PJPEG. By reducing file sizes and optimizing loading times, websites can decrease their data transfer volumes, potentially leading to lower energy consumption in data centers and network infrastructure. This aspect aligns with the broader objectives of green computing, emphasizing the importance of energy efficiency in digital technologies. While the impact of image format selection on the environment may seem minor, when considered at the scale of the internet, it contributes to the overall energy efficiency of digital communications.
In conclusion, the Progressive JPEG format represents a sophisticated approach to image compression and display, offering numerous benefits for online content delivery. With its progressive loading feature, PJPEG can improve user engagement by optimizing image loading times without sacrificing quality. Despite some challenges in implementation and compatibility, the advantages of PJPEG make it a valuable tool for web developers, graphic designers, and content creators aiming to enhance the visual experience of their digital products. As internet technologies continue to evolve, understanding and leveraging formats like PJPEG will remain crucial for delivering content efficiently and sustainably.
Supported formats
AAI.aai
AAI Dune image
AI.ai
Adobe Illustrator CS2
AVIF.avif
AV1 Image File Format
BAYER.bayer
Raw Bayer Image
BMP.bmp
Microsoft Windows bitmap image
CIN.cin
Cineon Image File
CLIP.clip
Image Clip Mask
CMYK.cmyk
Raw cyan, magenta, yellow, and black samples
CUR.cur
Microsoft icon
DCX.dcx
ZSoft IBM PC multi-page Paintbrush
DDS.dds
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
DPX.dpx
SMTPE 268M-2003 (DPX 2.0) image
DXT1.dxt1
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
EPDF.epdf
Encapsulated Portable Document Format
EPI.epi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPS.eps
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSF.epsf
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSI.epsi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPT.ept
Encapsulated PostScript with TIFF preview
EPT2.ept2
Encapsulated PostScript Level II with TIFF preview
EXR.exr
High dynamic-range (HDR) image
FF.ff
Farbfeld
FITS.fits
Flexible Image Transport System
GIF.gif
CompuServe graphics interchange format
HDR.hdr
High Dynamic Range image
HEIC.heic
High Efficiency Image Container
HRZ.hrz
Slow Scan TeleVision
ICO.ico
Microsoft icon
ICON.icon
Microsoft icon
J2C.j2c
JPEG-2000 codestream
J2K.j2k
JPEG-2000 codestream
JNG.jng
JPEG Network Graphics
JP2.jp2
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPE.jpe
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPEG.jpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPG.jpg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPM.jpm
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPS.jps
Joint Photographic Experts Group JPS format
JPT.jpt
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JXL.jxl
JPEG XL image
MAP.map
Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database (MrSID)
MAT.mat
MATLAB level 5 image format
PAL.pal
Palm pixmap
PALM.palm
Palm pixmap
PAM.pam
Common 2-dimensional bitmap format
PBM.pbm
Portable bitmap format (black and white)
PCD.pcd
Photo CD
PCT.pct
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PCX.pcx
ZSoft IBM PC Paintbrush
PDB.pdb
Palm Database ImageViewer Format
PDF.pdf
Portable Document Format
PDFA.pdfa
Portable Document Archive Format
PFM.pfm
Portable float format
PGM.pgm
Portable graymap format (gray scale)
PGX.pgx
JPEG 2000 uncompressed format
PICT.pict
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PJPEG.pjpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
PNG.png
Portable Network Graphics
PNG00.png00
PNG inheriting bit-depth, color-type from original image
PNG24.png24
Opaque or binary transparent 24-bit RGB (zlib 1.2.11)
PNG32.png32
Opaque or binary transparent 32-bit RGBA
PNG48.png48
Opaque or binary transparent 48-bit RGB
PNG64.png64
Opaque or binary transparent 64-bit RGBA
PNG8.png8
Opaque or binary transparent 8-bit indexed
PNM.pnm
Portable anymap
PPM.ppm
Portable pixmap format (color)
PS.ps
Adobe PostScript file
PSB.psb
Adobe Large Document Format
PSD.psd
Adobe Photoshop bitmap
RGB.rgb
Raw red, green, and blue samples
RGBA.rgba
Raw red, green, blue, and alpha samples
RGBO.rgbo
Raw red, green, blue, and opacity samples
SIX.six
DEC SIXEL Graphics Format
SUN.sun
Sun Rasterfile
SVG.svg
Scalable Vector Graphics
TIFF.tiff
Tagged Image File Format
VDA.vda
Truevision Targa image
VIPS.vips
VIPS image
WBMP.wbmp
Wireless Bitmap (level 0) image
WEBP.webp
WebP Image Format
YUV.yuv
CCIR 601 4:1:1 or 4:2:2
Frequently asked questions
How does this work?
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
How long does it take to convert a file?
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
What happens to my files?
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
What file types can I convert?
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
How much does this cost?
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Can I convert multiple files at once?
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.