OCR any PNG64
Drag and drop or click to select.
Private and secure
Everything happens in your browser. Your files never touch our servers.
Blazing fast
No uploading, no waiting. Convert the moment you drop a file.
Actually free
No account required. No hidden costs. No file size tricks.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
A quick tour of the pipeline
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
Engines and libraries
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Datasets and benchmarks
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
Output formats and downstream use
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
Practical guidance
- Start with data & cleanliness. If your images are phone photos or mixed-quality scans, invest in thresholding (adaptive & Otsu) and deskew (Hough) before any model tuning. You’ll often gain more from a robust preprocessing recipe than from swapping recognizers.
- Choose the right detector. For scanned pages with regular columns, a page segmenter (zones → lines) may suffice; for natural images, single-shot detectors like EAST are strong baselines and plug into many toolkits (OpenCV example).
- Pick a recognizer that matches your text. For printed Latin, Tesseract (LSTM/OEM) is sturdy and fast; for multi-script or quick prototypes, EasyOCR is productive; for handwriting or historical typefaces, consider Kraken or Calamari and plan to fine-tune. If you need tight coupling to document understanding (key-value extraction, VQA), evaluate TrOCR (OCR) versus Donut (OCR-free) on your schema—Donut may remove a whole integration step.
- Measure what matters. For end-to-end systems, report detection F-score and recognition CER/WER (both based on Levenshtein edit distance; see CTC); for layout-heavy tasks, track IoU/tightness and character-level normalized edit distance as in ICDAR RRC evaluation kits.
- Export rich outputs. Prefer hOCR /ALTO (or both) so you keep coordinates and reading order—vital for search hit highlighting, table/field extraction, and provenance. Tesseract’s CLI and pytesseract make this a one-liner.
Looking ahead
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Further reading & tools
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is OCR?
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
How does OCR work?
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
What are some practical applications of OCR?
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
Is OCR always 100% accurate?
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Can OCR recognize handwriting?
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Can OCR handle multiple languages?
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
What's the difference between OCR and ICR?
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
Does OCR work with any font and text size?
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
What are the limitations of OCR technology?
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Can OCR scan colored text or colored backgrounds?
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
What is the PNG64 format?
Opaque or binary transparent 64-bit RGBA
The PNG64 image format stands as an enhanced version of the widely recognized Portable Network Graphics (PNG) format, tailored to meet the needs for higher color depths and enhanced transparency capabilities in digital imaging. This advanced version extends the conventional PNG's capabilities by supporting a 64-bit color depth, essentially encompassing 16 bits per channel for red, green, blue, and an additional 16 bits for the alpha transparency channel. This fundamental enhancement ushers in a new era of image quality, allowing for over 281 trillion colors, thereby ensuring that images are rendered with unparalleled precision and vibrancy.
The inception of the PNG64 format can be traced back to the growing demand for higher fidelity in digital images across various applications, including digital art, professional photography, and high-definition graphic design. Traditional image formats like JPEG or the standard PNG are limited in their color depth, typically capping at 8 or 16 bits per channel, which can lead to banding in gradients and insufficient detail capture in high-contrast scenes. PNG64 addresses these limitations by dramatically increasing the range of color and detail that can be encoded in an image, making it an invaluable tool for professionals seeking the highest possible quality.
At its core, the PNG64 format maintains the structural integrity and functionality of its predecessor, leveraging the same lossless compression algorithm that ensures no loss of image quality upon saving. This is particularly crucial for archival purposes and industries where precision is paramount, such as digital archiving and scientific imaging. The lossless nature of PNG64 means that, despite its higher fidelity, images can be compressed to a manageable size without sacrificing any detail, making it a practical choice for both offline and online uses.
The enhanced alpha transparency channel in PNG64 represents a significant leap forward in rendering translucent and semi-transparent objects. With 16 bits dedicated solely to transparency, PNG64 allows for a much smoother gradient of opacity levels, from completely transparent to fully opaque. This capability is especially beneficial in graphic design, where nuanced transparency effects can significantly impact the visual presentation, as well as in web design, where icons and interface elements often require precise transparency to blend seamlessly with various backgrounds.
Adopting PNG64 entails certain considerations, notably in file size and compatibility. Given the extended color and transparency depth, PNG64 files are inherently larger than their PNG counterparts. This has implications for web use, where loading times and bandwidth usage are critical factors. Consequently, it's advisable to use PNG64 judiciously, reserving it for situations where image quality takes precedence over file size. Moreover, compatibility with older software or systems that do not support 16 bits per channel may pose challenges, necessitating checks on end-user environments to ensure a seamless experience.
The technical underpinnings of PNG64 are rooted in its file structure, which closely mirrors that of standard PNG files. A PNG64 file consists of a header, which contains critical information about the image such as its dimensions and bit depth, followed by several chunks that store the actual image data and metadata. The increased bit depth in PNG64 necessitates modifications to these chunks, allowing them to accommodate the larger amount of data required by 64-bit color images. Among these, the Image Header (IHDR) chunk plays a pivotal role, as it must correctly signal the 16-bit depth for each channel to ensure proper decoding and display.
Compression in PNG64 remains one of its most impressive features, employing the same DEFLATE algorithm used by standard PNG files. Despite the increased amount of data, this algorithm efficiently reduces file sizes by identifying and eliminating redundancy within the image data. However, the effectiveness of compression can vary depending on the image content; images with large areas of uniform color or simple patterns tend to compress more effectively. This inherent variability underscores the importance of considering the nature of the image when choosing PNG64, as complex images with high color variation might result in larger file sizes.
The creation and manipulation of PNG64 images require specific software capable of handling the advanced features inherent to this format. Many high-end image editing and graphics software have been updated to support PNG64, offering users the ability to work directly with this format. This includes capabilities such as adjusting the bit depth, managing color profiles, and fine-tuning the transparency settings. For developers, libraries such as libpng have been extended to include support for PNG64, facilitating the integration of this format into applications and services.
One of the key applications of PNG64 is in digital photography, where capturing the broadest range of colors and nuances in light is crucial. Photographers can benefit from the format's ability to maintain the integrity of the original scene, with subtle hues and gradients preserved in breathtaking detail. This makes PNG64 an ideal choice for storing master copies of photographs, providing a digital negative that can be accurately reproduced or modified without degradation.
In the realm of digital art and graphic design, PNG64's deep color and transparency capabilities open up new creative possibilities. Artists can employ a broader palette of colors and subtle transparency effects, which are especially important in complex compositions or when working with various blending modes. The enhanced detail and color specificity also make PNG64 suitable for professional printing scenarios, where reproducing the artwork's true colors and textures is paramount.
Despite its many advantages, PNG64 is not without its challenges, particularly regarding performance and storage. The larger file sizes associated with PNG64 images can strain storage solutions and slow down image processing times, especially in resource-limited environments. Furthermore, the increased complexity of handling 64-bit color data demands more from hardware and software, potentially limiting the use of PNG64 in low-specification devices and affecting overall system performance.
The future of PNG64 in the digital imaging landscape looks promising, with ongoing improvements in compression algorithms and processing hardware gradually mitigating the concerns related to file size and performance. As technology advances, the trade-offs between quality and efficiency are expected to lessen, making PNG64 more accessible and appealing for a wider range of applications. Moreover, the growing importance of visual fidelity in digital content creation and consumption underscores the continued relevance and potential expansion of the PNG64 format.
In conclusion, the PNG64 image format represents a significant advancement in digital imaging technology, offering unprecedented color depth and transparency control. Its ability to render images with exceptional detail and vibrancy makes it a compelling choice for professionals and enthusiasts alike. While the format poses challenges in terms of file size, compatibility, and performance, the benefits it provides in image quality are unparalleled. As the digital imaging industry continues to evolve, PNG64 stands as a testament to the ongoing quest for perfection in visual representation, promising to play a crucial role in the future of digital art, photography, and graphic design.
Supported formats
AAI.aai
AAI Dune image
AI.ai
Adobe Illustrator CS2
AVIF.avif
AV1 Image File Format
BAYER.bayer
Raw Bayer Image
BMP.bmp
Microsoft Windows bitmap image
CIN.cin
Cineon Image File
CLIP.clip
Image Clip Mask
CMYK.cmyk
Raw cyan, magenta, yellow, and black samples
CUR.cur
Microsoft icon
DCX.dcx
ZSoft IBM PC multi-page Paintbrush
DDS.dds
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
DPX.dpx
SMTPE 268M-2003 (DPX 2.0) image
DXT1.dxt1
Microsoft DirectDraw Surface
EPDF.epdf
Encapsulated Portable Document Format
EPI.epi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPS.eps
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSF.epsf
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript
EPSI.epsi
Adobe Encapsulated PostScript Interchange format
EPT.ept
Encapsulated PostScript with TIFF preview
EPT2.ept2
Encapsulated PostScript Level II with TIFF preview
EXR.exr
High dynamic-range (HDR) image
FF.ff
Farbfeld
FITS.fits
Flexible Image Transport System
GIF.gif
CompuServe graphics interchange format
HDR.hdr
High Dynamic Range image
HEIC.heic
High Efficiency Image Container
HRZ.hrz
Slow Scan TeleVision
ICO.ico
Microsoft icon
ICON.icon
Microsoft icon
J2C.j2c
JPEG-2000 codestream
J2K.j2k
JPEG-2000 codestream
JNG.jng
JPEG Network Graphics
JP2.jp2
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPE.jpe
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPEG.jpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPG.jpg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
JPM.jpm
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JPS.jps
Joint Photographic Experts Group JPS format
JPT.jpt
JPEG-2000 File Format Syntax
JXL.jxl
JPEG XL image
MAP.map
Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database (MrSID)
MAT.mat
MATLAB level 5 image format
PAL.pal
Palm pixmap
PALM.palm
Palm pixmap
PAM.pam
Common 2-dimensional bitmap format
PBM.pbm
Portable bitmap format (black and white)
PCD.pcd
Photo CD
PCT.pct
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PCX.pcx
ZSoft IBM PC Paintbrush
PDB.pdb
Palm Database ImageViewer Format
PDF.pdf
Portable Document Format
PDFA.pdfa
Portable Document Archive Format
PFM.pfm
Portable float format
PGM.pgm
Portable graymap format (gray scale)
PGX.pgx
JPEG 2000 uncompressed format
PICT.pict
Apple Macintosh QuickDraw/PICT
PJPEG.pjpeg
Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format
PNG.png
Portable Network Graphics
PNG00.png00
PNG inheriting bit-depth, color-type from original image
PNG24.png24
Opaque or binary transparent 24-bit RGB (zlib 1.2.11)
PNG32.png32
Opaque or binary transparent 32-bit RGBA
PNG48.png48
Opaque or binary transparent 48-bit RGB
PNG64.png64
Opaque or binary transparent 64-bit RGBA
PNG8.png8
Opaque or binary transparent 8-bit indexed
PNM.pnm
Portable anymap
PPM.ppm
Portable pixmap format (color)
PS.ps
Adobe PostScript file
PSB.psb
Adobe Large Document Format
PSD.psd
Adobe Photoshop bitmap
RGB.rgb
Raw red, green, and blue samples
RGBA.rgba
Raw red, green, blue, and alpha samples
RGBO.rgbo
Raw red, green, blue, and opacity samples
SIX.six
DEC SIXEL Graphics Format
SUN.sun
Sun Rasterfile
SVG.svg
Scalable Vector Graphics
TIFF.tiff
Tagged Image File Format
VDA.vda
Truevision Targa image
VIPS.vips
VIPS image
WBMP.wbmp
Wireless Bitmap (level 0) image
WEBP.webp
WebP Image Format
YUV.yuv
CCIR 601 4:1:1 or 4:2:2
Frequently asked questions
How does this work?
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
How long does it take to convert a file?
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
What happens to my files?
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
What file types can I convert?
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
How much does this cost?
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Can I convert multiple files at once?
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.